Research Analyzer
← Back ICRA 2026

An Analysis of Constraint-Based Multi-Agent Pathfinding Algorithms

Hannah Lee, James D. Motes, Marco Morales,, and Nancy M. Amato

PDF

AI summary

Key figure (auto-extracted from paper)
Aggressive constraints solve more instances as scale increases, while conservative constraints yield better solution quality when both succeed.
Multi-Agent Pathfinding Constraint-Based Search Conflict-Based Search Multi-Robot Motion Planning Constraint Classification Path Planning

Problem

Selecting appropriate constraints for constraint-based multi-agent pathfinding is challenging due to varying problem difficulties and representation topologies. Traditional analyses do not generalize well to complex representations like roadmaps used in multi-robot motion planning.

Approach

The study classifies constraints as conservative or aggressive, evaluates vanilla CBS and CBSw/P algorithms across a hybrid grid-roadmap representation at varying resolutions, and synthesizes findings into a decision flowchart for constraint selection.

Key results

  • Aggressive constraints improve solvability and runtime efficiency at higher scales
  • Conservative constraints yield stronger solution quality when both methods succeed
  • Environment topology dictates optimal constraint choice, with open spaces favoring aggressive constraints
  • Decision flowchart guides constraint selection based on topology, scale, resolution, and time constraints

Why it matters

Provides actionable guidelines for researchers and practitioners designing or deploying constraint-based pathfinding algorithms in multi-agent and multi-robot systems.

Abstract

This study informs the design of future multi- agent pathfinding (MAPF) and multi-robot motion planning (MRMP) algorithms by guiding choices based on constraint clas- sification for constraint-based search algorithms. We categorize constraints as conservative or aggressive and provide insights into their search behavior, focusing specifically on vanilla Conflict- Based Search (CBS) and Conflict-Based Search with Priorities (CBSw/P). Under a hybrid grid-roadmap representation with varying resolution, we observe that aggressive (priority con- straint) formulations tend to solve more instances as agent count or resolution increases, whereas conservative (motion constraint) formulations yield stronger solution quality when both succeed. Findings are synthesized in a decision flowchart, aiding users in selecting suitable constraints. Recommendations extend to Multi- Robot Motion Planning (MRMP), emphasizing the importance of considering topological features alongside problem, solution, and representation features. A comprehensive exploration of the study, including raw data and map performance, is available in our public GitHub Repository3.

Index terms

Path Planning for Multiple Mobile Robots or Agents Motion and Path Planning Cooperating Robots Search Algorithms

Related papers