Research Analyzer
← Back ICRA 2026

Volumetric Ergodic Control

Jueun Kwon, Max Muchen Sun, Todd Murphey

PDF

AI summary

Key figure (auto-extracted from paper)
Incorporating volumetric robot and sensor geometry into ergodic control more than doubles coverage efficiency while guaranteeing reliable task completion.
Ergodic control Volumetric representation Motion planning Coverage optimization iLQR Robot sensing

Problem

Standard ergodic control models robots as point masses, ignoring how their physical bodies and sensors interact with the environment, which limits coverage efficiency in practical tasks.

Approach

We introduce volumetric ergodic control (VEC), which replaces point-mass states with sample-based volumetric representations of robot bodies and sensors, preserving asymptotic coverage guarantees with minimal computational overhead.

Key results

  • More than doubles coverage efficiency over standard ergodic control
  • Maintains 100% task completion rate across all benchmarks
  • Compatible with standard iLQR optimization and arbitrary sample-based models
  • Validated in simulation and on a Franka robot arm for erasing tasks

Why it matters

Bridges the gap between theoretical coverage algorithms and real-world robotic applications by accounting for physical robot and sensor geometry.

Abstract

Ergodic control synthesizes optimal coverage be- haviors over spatial distributions for nonlinear systems. How- ever, existing formulations model the robot as a non-volumetric point, whereas in practice a robot interacts with the environ- ment through its body and sensors with physical volume. In this work, we introduce a new ergodic control formulation that optimizes spatial coverage using a volumetric state rep- resentation. Our method preserves the asymptotic coverage guarantees of ergodic control, adds minimal computational overhead for real-time control, and supports arbitrary sample- based volumetric models. We evaluate our method across search and manipulation tasks—with multiple robot dynamics and end-effector geometries or sensor models—and show that it improves coverage efficiency by more than a factor of two while maintaining a 100% task completion rate across all experiments, outperforming the standard ergodic control method. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a robot arm performing mechanical erasing tasks. Project website: https://murpheylab.github.io/vec/

Index terms

Motion and Path Planning Planning under Uncertainty Sensor-based Control

Related papers